San Francisco Frontiers - Iran says US violated peace deal as both sides trade fire

The trading of fire, which came after Washington accused Tehran of attacking a cargo ship in the Strait of Hormuz earlier in the week, raised questions about efforts to keep the crucial waterway open while both sides negotiate a broader, final deal.

US Central Command (CENTCOM) said the latest American strikes, against Iranian missile and drone storage sites and coastal radar positions, were a response to "unwarranted aggression against commercial shipping by Iranian forces" that "clearly violated the ceasefire".

But Iran lashed out at the attacks after its Revolutionary Guards launched its own retaliatory strikes.

"These brutal attacks, which targeted Iranian coastal surveillance facilities, are a blatant violation" of the memorandum of understanding to end the war, the Iranian foreign ministry said.

The Guards said they had struck US sites in the Gulf region in retaliation and that "if the aggression is repeated, our response will be broader than this", according to a Telegram post by state TV.

Bahrain's foreign ministry said the country was targeted by several Iranian drones early Saturday, condemning the attacks and accusing Tehran of "sabotaging peace efforts".

On the US strikes, Iranian state television, citing a reporter in the southern city of Sirik, said an explosion was heard at a pier there late Friday. It quoted a military source saying a "projectile impact" in the area caused the blast.

"Sirik Port is operating normally, and no damage has been reported to its equipment or facilities," Mehr news agency later said.

CENTCOM described the operation as "a powerful response to yesterday's attack on a commercial ship that was transiting the Strait of Hormuz".

US President Donald Trump had earlier denounced what he described as an Iranian drone strike on the vessel, saying "this is a foolish violation of our ceasefire agreement".

Vice President JD Vance issued a direct warning, posting on X that "violence will be met with violence" if Iran carries out any further attacks.

Iran has warned vessels not to enter or leave the Gulf through the strait without permission, but ships have continued to move, some using a route not authorised by Tehran.

Despite the latest flare-up, oil prices have fallen sharply on hopes that traffic through Hormuz -- a strategic waterway which normally sees around a fifth of the world's oil and gas exports -- would keep recovering.

- Lebanon framework -

Israel and Lebanon hailed an agreement signed Friday with the US to pave a way towards peace on their front in the war, although Iran-backed Hezbollah warned the deal would thwart plans to resolve the broader conflict.

The agreement -- which includes a pilot effort in which Lebanese soldiers take control of two areas occupied by Israel, as well as a process aimed at disarming Hezbollah -- is the result of five rounds of talks in the US capital.

At a Washington signing ceremony, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, flanked by Israeli and Lebanese envoys, said the trilateral accord "begins to put in place a framework for lasting peace and security".

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu welcomed the framework as a victory against Iran, which argues the Lebanon front is inseparable from the wider war and should be resolved as part of US-Iran talks.

He said the agreement would allow the Lebanese army to return to two "pilot areas" in southern Lebanon, but that Israeli forces would remain in their security zone until Hezbollah is disarmed. Displaced civilians would be prevented from returning.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun welcomed the unpublished framework as a "first step" towards civilians returning home "under the sovereignty of the Lebanese state".

But Hezbollah supporters took to the streets of Beirut late Friday to protest the agreement.

- Nuclear safeguards -

The UN nuclear watchdog has warned that any final US-Iran settlement would need strong safeguards to ensure Tehran does not build a nuclear weapon.

Iran's nuclear programme remains a central sticking point, with Tehran and Washington giving conflicting accounts of whether inspectors will regain access to the Islamic republic's facilities.

"The government of Iran has declared quite clearly that this is not their intention," International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi said Friday of developing nuclear weapons.

"But of course intentions are not enough. We have to have a very strong verification system in place... as soon as is practicable."

The interim agreement says Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium should be "downblended" under IAEA supervision.

burs-ft/mlm/msp/ane/jfx/amj

Z.Sanchez--SFF