San Francisco Frontiers - US Supreme Court to hear racial gerrymandering case

The high-stakes voting rights case involves a challenge to a congressional district map drawn up by the Republican-majority legislature in South Carolina.

It is one of several legal battles involving racial gerrymandering -- the manipulation of electoral maps to minimize the voting power of minorities -- winding their way through the US courts.

A panel of federal judges approved a new congressional map for the southern state of Alabama this month that includes a second electoral district with a large population of African Americans, who tend to vote Democratic.

"The law requires the creation of an additional district that affords Black Alabamians, like everyone else, a fair and reasonable opportunity to elect candidates of their choice," they said.

Black voters represent around a quarter of registered voters in Alabama but are in a majority in only one of the state's seven US House districts.

The new map was drawn up after the Supreme Court ruled in June that the redistricting plan adopted by Alabama for the 2022 congressional elections violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which was passed by Congress during the civil rights movement to prevent racial discrimination at the polls.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, both conservatives, joined the three liberal justices to fashion the 5-4 majority in the Alabama case.

A congressional map in Louisiana is also facing a legal challenge on the grounds it results in just one Black majority district although African Americans make up 30 percent of the southern state's population.

Republicans currently hold a slim 221-212 majority in the House and an increase in the number of Black majority districts could tip the balance in next year's congressional elections, when all 435 House seats will be up for grabs.

- 'Bleached' Charleston -

In the South Carolina case, a three-judge panel found the redrawn congressional map moved 60 percent of the Black residents of Charleston -- nearly 30,000 people -- from one district into another which already had a Black majority.

Six of the current members of the House from South Carolina are white and one is Black.

Sophia Lin Lakin of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which brought the South Carolina case along with the civil rights group the NAACP, said the state's congressional map constitutes "an extreme racial gerrymander."

"It limits the ability of Black voters to access representatives who can advocate for them," Lakin said.

She noted that the panel of lower court judges had ruled unanimously that the map "violates the Constitution by sorting voters predominantly on the basis of their race."

"In service of that racial target, the state legislature, 'bleached' Charleston, in the words of the court, by selectively targeting areas lived in by many Black voters for movement out of the congressional district," she said.

Jeff Rosen, president of the National Constitution Center, said the South Carolina Republican lawmakers who drew up the map openly acknowledged that they were carving Black voters out of Charleston, but claimed it was a permissible partisan gerrymander and not a racial gerrymander.

"They say the effort was a political effort of increasing incumbency protection and electing Republicans and the intent was not to harm Black people," he said.

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the South Carolina case on Wednesday and is expected to issue a ruling by the end of January.

U.Lee--SFF